Jan 12, 2023 · Fujifilm XF 16-80mm F4; One of my least favorite lenses, the 16-80mm F4 always disappointed in regards to image quality. I think it’s a direct competitor to this lens. Fujifilm XF 18-55 F2.8-F4.0; The standard kit lens. A used copy can be purchased for around $300. Fujifilm XF 50-140 F2.8; A beast.
Oct 9, 2021 · The 18‑135 is a longer, and the 16‑80 wider. Note the marked aperture ring on the 16‑80, and the Auto-Aperture/OIS switches on the 18‑135. The 16‑80 has a 72 mm filter thread, while the 18‑135 uses 67 mm filters. This is somewhat annoying for me, as my filters are all 67 mm, which also fit on my 70‑300.
Feb 1, 2017 · The price difference is significant though, and for the price of the 16-80, you could probably get a 16-85 and a 50mm prime as well, or even a telephoto like the 55-300 or the newer 70-300. Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain
This is especially true when comparing the XF 16mm F2.8 WR to either of the zooms, both of which weigh about 4× as much as the tiny prime. Even the XF 16mm F1.4 WR weighs more than twice as much as the newer XF 16mm F2.8 WR, but it’s just over half the weight of the XF 8-16mm F2.8 WR. XF 16mm F2.8 WR.
Jan 15, 2021 · Expert news, reviews and videos of the latest digital cameras, lenses, accessories, and phones. Get answers to your questions in our photography forums.
Ql20boa. 357 82 356 81 336 419 12 297 292
16 55 vs 16 80
